Re: [ubl-tsc] Possible base for editing

[Jon Bosak <bosak@pinax.com>]

Andrew M Schoka wrote:
> John,

> I have made changes to section 2.14 based upon a suggested input from
> Marco as a test of the process. I would like to know if this process
> of commenting on your base is a good approach for you to do your work.

Yes, this is perfect.  I know the method is tedious, but at this stage
it's the only way we can keep things straight.

> A question about the graphic (Fig 55 Initiate Freight Management
> Process).
>
> Since we now have a Transportation Status Request, wouldn't it be
> appropriate to include that as a request for status since he is likely
> to be more out of the flow after receiving the waybill if indeed he
> would receive a waybill.
>
> Maybe this is more appropriate for the TSC participants (eg Tim)
> should comment on.

Yes.  I have no useful opinion on this.  Tim?

Jon