FW: First Production Use of PO and Invoice UBL at Q/Sun

[Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@sun.com>]

Please let Stephen Parker know if you know of any other UBL 1.0 Beta 
implementations in production that would keep IMPAQ from making the 
claim below.
Thanks, -A

Parker, Stephen wrote:

>Anne,
>
>Can you forward this email to the ttsc mail list as it has just bounced
>for me (because I am have not registered to that SC I guess)
>
>Yours
> 
>Stephen
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Parker, Stephen 
>Sent: 26 February 2004 09:57
>To: 'anne.hendry@sun.com'
>Cc: ubl-ttsc@lists.oasis-open.org; ubl-isc@lists.oasis-open.org;
>'jon.bosak@sun.com'; 'tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au'
>Subject: First Production Use of PO and Invoice UBL at Q/Sun
>Importance: High
>
>Anne (and others),
>
>Anne as you are aware I have been working with Jon Bosak to create a
>press release on the production implementation at Q Associates using 1.0
>beta.  Given that we wish to make a "First implementation of OASIS UBL
>1.0 Beta goes into production" statement, Jon has asked me to check
>again that this is a legitimate claim.  Therefore can I please ask
>anybody to shout loud before 1200 GMT on Friday 27th February (tomorrow)
>if they are aware of anything that was IN PRODUCTION ahead of Q, details
>of timings are below:
>
>"Purchase Order AND Invoice full round trip between Sun and Q
>Associates, went live 5th Jan 2004 using UBL 1.0 beta.  Order values
>well over $1M/month are transacted.  Earlier PO only phase (using 0.7)
>went live in July 2003"
>
>Previous requests/checks with the ISC (see below) indicate that the
>claim is valid, however to be sure...... 
>
>CC: Tim I have included you as Jon has mentioned work that is going on
>"down under" with the Australian Wheat Board.
>
>Yours
>Stephen JK Parker
>Director and Operations Manager
>IMPAQ Information Management (UK) Ltd
>t: +44 (0)1483 466900
>e: sparker@impaq.co.uk
>w: www.impaq.co.uk 
>
>  
>