[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposal 3 in our CCTS feedback
Even though I'm a newbie when it comes to 11179/ebXML stuff, I like it too. I think the original definition of RT nicely encapsulates the semantic and structural aspects of RT/CCT taken together. (There's only one part that I still find counter-intuitive: A "Representation Term" should be merely the name assigned to a "Representation", but we never see "Representation" treated as a real thing on its own.) Eve Michael C. Rawlins wrote: > Ooh! Mikey likes it! > > Thanks, Tim, for doing the research on this. > > Tim McGrath wrote: ... >> In fact, looking at this again, I wonder if just asking them to adopt >> the original ISO 11179 definition is what we really mean!?? -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC