[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: What CCT and DT should look like - models and mapping to XSD
From all the discussions going on about CCT/UDT/SDT schemas, i think it is time to take stock and consolidate our approach. My proposal is that we drive the schema generation from the data model (as Michael has been advocating). Currently we have only the Specialised Data Types for Codes modelled this way, but it is clear we need to do this for the Core Component Types and Unspecialised Datatypes as well. Therefore, based on the discussions we have been having, i have prepared draft spreadsheets for how UBL should implement both CCTs and UDTs. This includes their correct UBL Name/attribute names and their mapping onto XSD datatypes. We need to get agreement on these so we can generate the correct schemas. Can I ask for comments as soon as possible. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
UBL-CoreComponentTypes-draft6.xls
UBL-UnSpecialisedDataTypes-draft6.xls
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]