[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Question regarding final NDR
Folks, Right now, the NDR has multiple occurrences of various CCTS terms represented in the following fashion: ccts:BasicCoreComponents ccts:AggregateCoreComponents ccts:BasicBusinessInformationEntities ccts:AggregateBusinessInformationEntities ccts:Datatypes ccts:CoreComponentTypes etc. etc. Acronyms such as ccts:BCC, ccts:ACC, ccts:ABIE currently are not used. This was done to ensure clarity each time these terms occur. My question is this - is the general consensus that I should preserve clarity through the absence of the use of acronyms, or should I shorten the document by the liberal use of acronyms? Mark
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]