Re: [ubl] Schema/model bugs

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

i support this as well.

Eduardo Gutentag wrote:

> Jon,
>
> I probably won't be able to make tomorrow's meeting again, but I would 
> like
> to encourage those who do participate in it to seriously reconsider the
> decision (if there was one, and if it is not in conflict with existing 
> NDR
> rules) to use DataType instead of Datatype. Both XSD and RELAXNG use 
> "datatype"
> or "Datatype" consistently throughout. The fact that "data" and "type" 
> are
> English words but "datatype" is not is not, in my mind, a sound argument.
> English words are made, not born, as it were, and the tendency to fuse 
> two
> distinct words as a sign that one is using a technical term rather than a
> compound one (e.g. database, filesystem, etc.) is well established and 
> does
> indeed give birth to new English words as needed.
>
>
> On 04/05/2004 06:23 PM, Jon.Bosak@Sun.COM wrote:
>
>> [MCRAWFORD@lmi.org:]
>>
>> | Another example of non technical changes to the NDR =
>> | rules for no valid reason.
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't realize that the NDR rules covered this.  What do
>> they say on this point?
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
>> of the OASIS TC), go to 
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>>
>>
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160