Re: [ubl] Schema edit test

[Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@sun.com>]

Perhaps use the words 'annotated' and 'nonannotated' (or something 
similar) rather than 'stripped', since 'stripped' gives no indication of 
what has been stripped?  Even if it's documented somewhere, lots of 
folks either won't read or notice the documentation before wanting to 
look at the schemas.  -A

jon.bosak@sun.com wrote:

> <pre wrap>Oops, the script that added the documentation line in the 
> maindoc
> schemas thought it was supposed to add it to every annotation
> element...
>
> Let's try that again.
>
> This time I've put the added documentation element at the top of
> the first annotation element (rather than the bottom as before);
> looks better there.
>
> Also, I've now created a directory structure that includes the
> versions with annotations stripped out; it looks like this:
>
>     xsd/
>         complete/
>             codelist/
>             common/
>             maindoc/
>         stripped/
>             codelist/
>             common/
>             maindoc/
>
> A zip file named xsd.zzz (to disguise it from firewalls) is
> attached below.  This will be the version included in tonight's
> partial document build if I don't hear otherwise.
>
> Jon
> </pre><pre wrap><BR><HR WIDTH="90%" SIZE=4><BR>To unsubscribe from 
> this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go 
> to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.</pre></body>
> </html>
> </html>