Re: [ubl] Second UBL 1.0 Q/A build, take 2 (20 April)

[jon.bosak@sun.com]

[Fabio.Arciniegas@postgraphy.com:]

| Attached you will find a physical report of broken links (none)
| and other factors in the UBL distibution as it currently
| stands. Please note that although there are no broken hyperlinks
| there is a number of broken local anchors.

The unused anchors are in the CM and FS pieces.  I trust that the
authors will take these out in the next revisions; no need to
bother with them now.

Jon