Re: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's)

[jon.bosak@sun.com]

[swebb@gefeg.com:]

| Both of your messages are excellent examples that emphasize the
| need for a structured QA process for the spreadsheets, models, and
| schema. IMHO, we need to develop a structured, systematic,
| repeatable process for review and QA that reduces differences in
| the future, and, reduces the amount of time spent for review and
| re-review. Other industry groups and standards bodies that I
| participate in have found a similar need mandatory, not just an
| option. I would like to suggest that the SSC TC form a QA
| workgroup that will be responsible for QA of all UBL releases. If
| such a group is formed, I will gladly volunteer to participate.

I will put this on the work list as a discussion item for UBL 1.1.

Jon