[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: To Comment 11 of 1.0 isses 20040721
Hello Jon, I said that the he namespaces are not based on the namespace rules of chapter 3.4.2 of wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc. The chapter 3.4.2 says that the namespace names for UBL schemas must be based on: for drafts: =========== urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:<name>:<major>:<minor>[<revision>] for standard: ============= urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:<name>:<major>:<minor> And as comparsion, here some examples of the current namespaces of UBL Versions 1.0: urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CommonAggregateComponents:1:0 urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:codelist:SubstitutionStatusCode:1:0 This namespaces do not have the term "schema" between ubl and <name>. This must be corrected either in ther namespace or in the specific chapter of the Naming and Design Rules. Kind regards, Gunther
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]