[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] UBL pending item h.2
Hi David, Thanks for pointing out that there are more of these. The ones that are mentioned in the issues list have been agreed to be fixed. They have been updated in the spreadsheets, and Saito-san felt they were important enough to change. There was agreement on this in the TC calls. As the 'TC Discussion' column points out, "There might be other instances where cardinality doesn't align with the definition; this is a Q/A exercise." So, as you've pointed out, we will have more coming up, and we'll have to decide on those along with any other results of the qa excercise. For now, though, we did agree to fix these 3 for 1.0. I'll make a note in the issues list of the two more you've pointed out. Thanks, Anne David Kruppke wrote: >Hi All, > >h.2 concerns the definition of the ASBIE OrderReference, >DespatchDocumentReference and >ReceiptDocumentReference in ABIE Invoice. > >The current definition is the following: > >"Provides a means of associating an Invoice with one or more Orders(Despatch >Advices/Receipt Advices)" > >I think it is OK to say "one or more" although the cardinality is 0..n. If >the ASBIE is used then it associates the invoice to at least one Order, >DespatchDocumentReference or ReceiptDocumentReference. Otherwise it is not >used. It cannot associate the invoice to zero references. > >Please compare the definitions of ReceiptAdvice/OrderReference and >DespatchAdvice/OrderReference. > > >Please answer to kruppke@gefeg.com, too. > > >Regards, David Kruppke > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]