Re: [ubl] CodeList in document-id (was: CD2 sanity check)

[Eduardo Gutentag <Eduardo.Gutentag@Sun.COM>]

Anne is right -- if we use <subtype> it should be xsd; codelist is not a
subtype of schema...And I agree with her that there is no need to specify
normatively anything beyond .../schema/

Sigh...

On 08/29/2004 10:09 PM, Anne Hendry wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> I think your example points out another problem.  I hadn't looked at NM6 
> all that closely until now.  Does NM6 necessarily follow from NM4 and 
> NM5?  Because if we follow the naming as it is in NM6, 'subtype' will 
> always be 'xsd', and we would have to have all schemas under a directory 
> names 'xsd', since there is no space in the NM6 pathname for the 
> subdirectories we now use to organize the schemas: 'common', 'codelist', 
> and 'maindoc'.
> 
> Here is an example from the AcknowledgementResponseCode' schema:
> 
> <xsd:import 
> namespace="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CoreComponentParameters-1.0" 
> schemaLocation="../common/UBL-CoreComponentParameters-1.0.xsd"/>
> 
> If we followed NM6 then we will also need to redo the package structure 
> to remove the subdirectories 'common', 'codelist', and 'maindoc', and 
> leave all schemas in the 'xsd' directory only.
> 
> So my question is whether there is a benefit in the specific pathname 
> being specified by NM6 over the schemaLocation we currently use?  Is 
> there some reason for us to change the package current structure to 
> match NM6?  Does NM6 add more value than the cost of adhering to it in 
> it's current form?  Is it the package that should change, or the rule? 
> NM6 says 'the UBL modules must be hosted ...'  Is there any reason for 
> NM6 to specify the pathname beyond the word 'schema' (ie. past 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/schema/)?
> 
> -A
> 
> jon.bosak@sun.com wrote:
> 
>> [stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk:]
>>
>> | This would require changes to the Schemas (the imports of the
>> | codelist Schemas) so I'm not sure it would be worth such changes
>> | since it may affect others downstream.
>>
>> Yeah, well, I'm sorry, but it's clear to me now that our final
>> naming and design rules require it.  Here are our rules:
>>
>>   [NMS4] The namespace names for UBL Schemas holding committee
>>   draft status MUST be of the form:
>>
>>      urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:<subtype>:<document-id>
>>
>>   [NMS5] The namespace names for UBL Schemas holding OASIS
>>   Standard status MUST be of the form:
>>
>>      urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:<subtype>:<document-id>
>>   [NMS6] UBL Schema modules MUST be hosted under the UBL
>>   committee directory:
>>
>>      
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/schema/<subtype>/UBL-<document-id>.<filetype> 
>>
>>
>> Now look at Anne's example:
>>
>>   <xsd:import 
>> namespace="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CurrencyCode-1.0" 
>> schemaLocation="../codelist/UBL-CodeList-CurrencyCode-1.0.xsd"/>
>>
>> Clearly by NMS5 the document-id in the namespace attribute is
>> "CurrencyCode-1.0", but just as clearly by NMS6 the document-id in
>> the schemaLocation attribute is "CodeList-CurrencyCode-1.0".  One
>> of these is wrong.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
>> of the OASIS TC), go to 
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>>
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
> the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
> 
> 

-- 
Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
Web Technologies and Standards |         Phone:  +1 510 550 4616 x31442
Sun Microsystems Inc.          |         W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD