[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 14|15 February 2005
[Correcting previous bad subject line] MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING 00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 15 FEBRUARY 2005 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Micah Dubinko Anne Hendry Tim McGrath Sylvia Webb STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar (http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm) SylviaW: The next Tax XML TC meeting will be held in conjunction with the OASIS meeting in New Orleans. OAG will meet Feb 28 - Mar 2 in Florida. Liaison reports Tax XML TC (SylviaW): Most of the focus is on XBRL. The TC decided that it did not have the resources to submit anything to UBL by the April deadline but hopes to catch up in UBL 2.0. The TC has decided not to endorse OAGIS; this will be documented in their next position paper to the OECD. OAG (SylviaW): OAG is working on OAGIS 9; have not seen it and will not be able to attend the next meeting. Note that GarretM is our liaison. OAGIS 9 BODs will continue to be proprietary. X12 (SylviaW): X12 has not had a formal liaison with UBL for some time, but they want to find out the [X12] procedures for doing that. They are talking about using the TBG CC library in their messages. AIA (SylviaW): Considering adoption of UBL and interested in status of UBL discussions with UN/CEFACT. Subcommittee reports HISC (MicahD): Did not hold a call last week but got work done anyway. Have a skeleton draft for the input specs and will be discussing it in a call tomorrow. SSC (AnneH): Did not meet last week. At this point the group spun off into a brief discussion of workflow, based on comments by JonB regarding his notes from the EDIFIX training session in McLean. Agreed: The primary input mechanism to EF remains the spreadsheets. Direct modifications to the EF model will be made only for small, individual changes. The SSC will do periodic validation checks against spreadsheets in progress to identify potential problems. Team reports COML (TimM): Have completed another round of refinement. Crimson Logic have made some suggestions and are currently revising their requirements; aiming to have that work done in the next 2-3 weeks. The project is on schedule. European Community input (TimM): The ad hoc IDA/OGC group has had two conferences and are now on a weekly schedule. The focus is on a common data model for government procurement. The OGC team is preparing a gap analysis between UBL 1.0 and their requirements, while IDA is inviting Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and other countries to participate. The result will be to bring a common set of requirements into UBL 1.1. The group has decided to operate outside of OASIS and may have a life beyond this submission to UBL 1.1. Some of this may supersede the previous input from the Swedish Association of Local Governments. TimM to mention to the group that we could use more UBL 1.0 translations. CONTENT WORK SESSION We don't have the updated content issues list we were expecting from BettyH. The last list we have was sent on 16 December. It appears that there are only two items left from the old list that have not been decided, but we need to formalize our working method. The list needs to be updated to include the results of more recent decisions made in the Pacific TC meetings. FOR NEXT WEEK Two items from the SALG on which we're still awaiting feedback: 1. Initial invoice tax amount, tax subtotal; the larger question is whether we should create a new doc type for credit note. 2. Payment instruction ID (or payment number) in financial account. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]