SV: Proposal of new business process model.

[Peter Larsen Borresen <plb@itst.dk>]

Hi Tim and Mark

First of all I would like to thank Mark for the many valuable comments and
corrections. I think I will wait sending out a new version before we have
discussed it tomorrow. 

I have tried to simplify the original proposed process model in order to
make it clear what is "need to have" and what is "nice to have". So it is
not an error that I have removed some docuemnts and partytypes from the
model -just a proposal. I surgest we move further on with the following
approach:

1) For each document type at least one scenario must be descibed to explain
the usage of this.
2) It is expensive to implement a new document type. So we must struggle for
simplicity. We must always ask our selves: can this be done more simply and
is this covered by the usage of an other document type.
3) We must struggle for consistency in the different phases of the
procurement face. 
4) We must remember to be true to the thoughts that version 1.0 was build
on. 
5) We must try to recognize and map other thermology of this subject,
particular on the partytypes used.
6) We must struggle for a thermology the is as clear and unambiguous as
possible.
6) We should plan a fase og face meeting soon to settle out the final
process definition. 

I look forward to talk to you tomorrow. 

Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Sendt: 2. juni 2005 01:49
Til: Mark Leitch
Cc: Peter Larsen Borresen; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org; 'JOSTEIN FRØMYR';
Emilio.CASTRILLEJO@cec.eu.int; amabel.grant@ogcbs.gsi.gov.uk;
dg@tenorconseil.fr; martin.forsberg@amnis.se; andre.hoddevik@ft.dep.no;
'Tim Benson'; stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk
Emne: Re: Proposal of new business process model.


I would agree that from your comments we seem to be diverging rather 
than converging!

Let us talk about how we can progress this on Friday's call.  

Mark Leitch wrote:

> Please see attached.
>
>  
>
> I think this needs far more discussion than can be achieved in a 
> weekly telephone conference if we are to progress satisfactorily.
>
>  
>
> Regards, Mark
>
>  
>
> Mark Leitch
>
> Director - Tritorr Limited
>
> Tel:    +44 1932 821112
>
> Cell:   +44 7881 822999
>
> Mail:   ml@tritorr.com <mailto:ml@tritorr.com>
>
> Site:   www.tritorr.com <http://www.tritorr.com>
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Larsen Borresen [mailto:plb@itst.dk]
> Sent: 27 May 2005 14:28
> To: 'ubl@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Cc: 'Mark Leitch'; 'JOSTEIN FRØMYR'; Emilio.CASTRILLEJO@cec.eu.int; 
> amabel.grant@ogcbs.gsi.gov.uk; Peter.Court@ogc.gsi.gov.uk; 
> dg@tenorconseil.fr; tb@abies.co.uk; martin.forsberg@amnis.se; 
> andre.hoddevik@ft.dep.no
> Subject: Proposal of new business process model.
>
>  
>
>  <<Proposal for UBL 2.0 process.doc>>
>
>  
>
> Dear all
>
>  
>
> Here is my proposal for a procurement process in UBL 2.0. I look 
> forward to
>
> receive you comments on the document.
>
>  
>
> Kind regard
>
>  
>
> Peter L. Borresen
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business
Informatics and Web Services
(coming soon from MIT Press)
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=632C40AB-4E94-4930-A94E
-22FF8CA5641F&ttype=2&tid=10476