Re: [ubl] Current UBL 2.0 issues list

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

Sorry it has taken a while to respond to this request, we have been 
checking the archives to see if this was brought up earlier.

Apparently it has not so we can add it to the UBL 2.0 issues list.

Oriol Bausą wrote:

>There is an issue we have seen when implementing the Invoice UBL 1.0 in
>Spain. 
>
>In Spain it's very common the use of different PaymentTerms: You should say
>the invoice will be payed in three different dates, with a different amounts
>and optionally with three different payment means. 
>
>In UBL 1.0 it's not possible to include that information, so our proposal to
>solve that issue is:
>
>1) To include an optional PaymentTermsAmount in the cac:PaymentTerms
>2) To include an optional PaymentMeans in the cac:PaymentTerms
>
>Hope it's not to late to ask for those modifications.
>
>Regards,
>Oriol Bausą
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] 
>Sent: lunes, 13 de junio de 2005 10:35
>To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [ubl] Current UBL 2.0 issues list
>
>Thanks to Peter Borresen we have an updated issues list for UBL 2.0
>
>This is for discussion on the Pacific call on June 13/14th.
>
>  
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=632C40AB-4E94-4930-A94E-22FF8CA5641F&ttype=2&tid=10476