[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Discussion of substitution groups
Global seems to me > to tie in very much with type > oriented schemas Actually, most arguments for local are centered around managing by types rather than types and elements. >and that in turn ties in with polymorhism (which > requires the global elements as well > as the global types). I assume you mean named types since there are no such thing as global types. >In other words > it seems to me that the industry, > where advocating global schemas > (increasingly so, it seems) does > seem to do so with features such > as inheritance / polymorphic > treatment of types strongly in mind, I would be interested in any research related to polymorphic treatment of types other than Arofan's paper since my google can't seem to find any. > along with the growing tool and > other standard support (XSLT 2, etc). Once again, just because a tool supports a feature, that is not a justifiable reason for using the feature. Else we will just use <any> and allow customizers free reign. Mark
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]