OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ubl] Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 19 October 2005 - Qualified Data Types


Tim,
 
In response to your statement "it sound like from the minutes as though we
are attempting to reinvent what is already going on." What do you suggest
that we consider to prevent reinventing the wheel?
 
Regards,
Sylvia
________________________________

From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 2:19 AM
To: swebb@gefeg.com
Cc: jon.bosak@sun.com; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ubl] Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 19 October 2005 -
Qualified Data Types


i can understand why they would be different.  the qDT we ae working is
based on the old UBL specilaizedDataType - but thats we have to go on
becasue (as you say) ATG2 dont use spreadsheets models (or anything but
schemas).

would it be better if  David could tell us how they are different, or better
still, described what the qDT spreadsheet needs to look like?  at present I
fell we are grasping in the dark trying to guess what the model we are
aiming for looks like.

it sound like from the minutes as though we are attempting to reinvent what
is already going on.

Sylvia Webb wrote: 

	Tim,
	
	When I imported the last qDT spreadsheet, I noticed some errors that
	required further research before any comments could be made. David
Kruppke
	completed that research this past Monday and determined that the uDT
and qDT
	model types are different and the cause of the errors. 
	
	Regards,
	Sylvia
	-----Original Message-----
	From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] 
	Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 9:37 PM
	To: jon.bosak@sun.com
	Cc: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
	Subject: Re: [ubl] Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 19 October 2005 -
	Qualified Data Types
	
	i am really confused by this discussion because for the past 3 weeks
we have
	been trying to supply Sylvia with a QDT spreadsheet that loads into
EDIFIX.
	
	i understood we were donw to agreeing on the values in the data type
column.
	so can someone explain what the difference between what Peter and I
have
	been doing is from what you are asking for now?
	
	
	jon.bosak@sun.com wrote:
	
	  

		     ACTION: JB to appeal to the list for volunteer(s) to
develop
		     a QDT spreadsheet.
		
		 
		
		    

	
	--
	regards
	tim mcgrath
	phone: +618 93352228  
	postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
	
	DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business
	Informatics and Web Services
	
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=632C40AB-4E94-4930-A94E
	-22FF8CA5641F&ttype=2&tid=10476
	
	
	
	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
	generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
	at:
	
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
	
	
	
	
	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
	generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
	at:
	
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
	
	  


-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business
Informatics and Web Services
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=632C40AB-4E94-4930-A94E
-22FF8CA5641F&ttype=2&tid=10476




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]