[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: VS: Documentstatus
Hi stephen There will be no information lost if it allways is in state original. My opinion is that we shoul corect errors because this is a major release. I would like people to yell if they have a need for it, otherwise UBL will be a long list of legacy errors. /Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk] Sendt: 26. oktober 2005 15:11 Til: Peter Larsen Borresen Emne: Re: Documentstatus Peter We'd need to keep this now for backwards compatibility but the original decison was a TC one at a plenary (several years ago in Montreal). There may be issues too with alignment with EDIFACT, etc. Steve >>> Peter Larsen Borresen <plb@itst.dk> 26/10/05 12:27:17 >>> Hi stephen What is the idea of putting documentStatus in recieptLine and despatchLine. Should not document status be used only in the documents that can be updated, such as the order docuements? /Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]