SV: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

[Peter Larsen Borresen <plb@itst.dk>]

Hi Stephen, all

I think we have a problem, if we have elements in our schemas that not even
the publisher (us, the UBL TC) knows the meaning of. There must be someone
here on this list that should be able to explain the idea of having
LineStatusCode on invoiceLine and DespatchLine or someone who knows somesone
who knows. My job the year after we have released the standard will be to
explain it to other people and I don't like the scenario telling people
"well, it's there because someone placed it there for a reason we don't
know".

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk]
Sendt: 26. oktober 2005 16:51
Til: Mikkel Hippe Brun; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode


Mikkel, all

I have a problem with this because much work has gone on
to establish UBL 1.0 and we don't have all the participants in
constant contact. I wouldn't want (nor I suspect would you)
to have to constantly watch UBL in future to see if I need to
contend for already well considered content in case it gets 
removed without equal consideration and as many public
reviews, liaison gap analyses, pleanries, etc as it took to get it
there. There are many things to consider such as customisations,
etc which have to be maintained and besides, none of has all
the combined knowledge involved in UBL 1.0 and it is very easy to
miss something (like a BIE association where we didn't expect it).

I'd have to vote against a UBL 2.0 pr release that disregarded all the
expensive investment to date like that.

All the best

Steve

>>> Mikkel Hippe Brun <mhb@itst.dk> 26/10/05 14:58:29 >>>
Dear all,

Regarding status codes. We have discussed the use of status codes in the
Catalogue work. I have argued that status codes should be mandatory. The
reason being that implementers will otherwise have to handle the situation
where the status code is not present as a special case. This adds an
implicit "null" value to the code-list, which is undefined. Lets help
implementers whenever possible.

In my opinion LineStatusCode should be removed if someone cannot come up
with a good explanation and business case for its use.

- Regards Mikkel

> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Peter Larsen Borresen 
> Sendt: 26. oktober 2005 15:04
> Til: 'ubl@lists.oasis-open.org' 
> Emne: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode
> 
> 
> Dear TC members
> 
> I have understood the use of LineStatusCode as a code to 
> understand whether
> the line  is original, has been copied or updated. 
> 
> Can anyone explain to me why we have LineStatusCode in invoice line
> documents and despatch line? These are not surposed to be updated.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Peter
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all 
> your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr 
> oups.php 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php