Re: [ubl] 3 January build of UBL 2.0 review package

["Yukinori Saito" <saito-yukinori@fujielectric.co.jp>]

Dear Jon Bosak,
Thank you very much for your sending us entire V2.0 package.
We (UBL JPLSC) will hold F2F meeting on January 6 in Tokyo.
We will discuss about UBL V2.0 specifications.

The following is my comment about V2.0 package.
As everybody of UBL members know, the architecture of UBL spreadsheets are
restructured.
Business documents and Reusables are categorized to the following three
categories.
(1)Business documents
- Catalogue
- Quotation
- Order
- Invoice
- Bill of Lading
- Others
(2) Business Domain Common Libraries
- Procurement Library
- Transportation Library
(3) Common Library

I think that the architecture of UBL spreadsheets should be described at
somewhere (e.g. index.html) in UBL V2.0 package. I attached the example
information written by Thomas Lee.

Best Regards,
Yukinori Saito

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <jon.bosak@sun.com>
To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 6:04 AM
Subject: [ubl] 3 January build of UBL 2.0 review package


Hello UBL TC,

A second build of the UBL 2.0 review package can temporarily be
found at

   http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/wd-UBL-2.0/

with the whole thing temporarily downloadable from

   http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/wd-UBL-2.0.zip

This draft bears a publication date of 3 January 2006.  This is
important because I'll be recycling the temporary URLs above as we
revise the package, so be careful to note the dates when you
download from these locations.  The 3 January draft differs from
the one dated 1 January that I posted yesterday chiefly in the
inclusion of Tables 1-3, which list the changes to 1.0 elements
and attributes in 2.0.

We will be discussing this in tomorrow's Atlantic TC call.  Please
send comments and corrections to the list.  Barring the discovery
of some new major problem, this is what I'll be asking our
stakeholders and ubl-dev to look at starting Wednesday afternoon
my time.

PLEASE NOTE that the purpose of this draft is to begin the OASIS
public review process and gather input.  It's not meant to be
perfect at this point.  So minor issues should simply be noted for
the issues list to be dealt with after the initial review.  The
kind of problems we're looking for today are the kind that would
prevent the specification from being used at all (for example,
invalid schemas or a missing document type).

I will be proposing in tomorrow's call that we begin a vote to
approve this build (modulo necessary editorial changes) as a
committee draft on Friday and submit it to OASIS to begin public
review the week of 16 January.

Jon

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

UBL V2.0 Model Architecture.doc