Re: [ubl] Extension element children

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2006-04-11 22:22 +0100, Stephen Green wrote:
>In response to Mike (Mike's explanation much clearer than mine) I
>have some sympathy for the extension element being at the start of
>the document so its relative position stays the same (and therefore
>simplifies a rule to say where it should appear). That's if it makes no
>other difference.

I very much like this idea, and I personally don't see a difference.

And in a SAX-based process, all of the extensions will have been 
discovered early on before hitting the meat of the document where the 
extensions have impact.

. . . . . . . . Ken


--
Registration open for XSLT/XSL-FO training: Wash.,DC 2006-06-12/16
Also for XML/XSLT/XSL-FO training:Birmingham,England 2006-05-22/25
Also for XSLT/XSL-FO training:    Copenhagen,Denmark 2006-05-08/11
World-wide on-site corporate, govt. & user group XML/XSL training.
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal