[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 10|11 April 2006
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING 00:30 - 02:30 UTC TUESDAY 11 APRIL 2006 ATTENDANCE Jon Bosak (chair) Stephen Green G. Ken Holman Tim McGrath (vice chair) Sylvia Webb STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm JB: Will be giving a UBL presentation at the SIIA "XML for the Financial Industry" Conference 3 May in Manhattan. Liaison report: ebBP TC SG: About to begin Committee Spec ballot. Subcommittee report: SBSC JB: Balloting ends Tuesday; looks like UBL 1.0 SBS will become a Committee Spec. Liaison report: UN/CEFACT JB: Expect to put the proposal in front of the TC Thursday. Subcommittee report: HISC GKH: Meeting tomorrow... Waiting for input from Zarella. Subcommittee report: PSC SW: PSC needs additional resources in processing comments if we're going to meet the deadline. JB: Sounds like we have a real problem here. SW: The PSC did start working on disposition of comments. There will be a revised list of comments to the full TC next week. The TSC has reported problems with accessing email and the kavi repository; no one can access a document that has been uploaded to a folder that doesn't allow read access, and no one can change access settings on a folder once it's made. Subcommittee report: TSC SW: The TSC have assigned work to review issues and should be starting this week. Review of Atlantic call Regarding the PI issue: JB: "Creator" in the original proposal just means the software. This is just for debugging. I did not make that clear in the Atlantic TC minutes. GKH: Then it's going to depend on whether the information in the proposed PI is an information item properly speaking or just an annotation. If the absence of the PI doesn't affect the information in the document instance -- if its omission does not affect the meaning of the document instance -- then a PI could be an appropriate way of making an annotation. But my comment [in email] about the syntax still stands. Schedule review http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00016.html JB: Have begun attempts to test the proposed code list methodology but am having the usual problems setting up the xerces parser. GKH and Norm Walsh are sending hints. ACTION ITEM REVIEW ACTION: JB to ask MB about input on CL metadata. Pending. ACTION: SW to remind Howard Mason about input from ISO TC184. JB: The date for closing this review cycle has passed; we have to proceed on assumption that we won't be receiving anything substantive for 2.0. ACTION: TM to communicate back to those who submitted comments that we've closed the comment period and inform them of our schedule going forward. Done. ACTION: JB to update the TC web site as soon as 1.0 SBS goes to ballot. Pending completion of the ballot. ACTION: JB to find meeting facilities in Montreal for August meeting. "Have sent mail to Ed Buchinski; no answer yet. GKH and SW will try some contacts." GKH: We should look at all the contacts we can find, so follow up with cmsmcq and Murray Maloney as recommended in that Atlantic call. ACTION: JB to user-test GKH's draft 0.4 (see mail of 20 Feb with pointer to the repository). In progress. ACTION: JB to fit this into the support package schedule: add lines for PSC example instances, TSC example instances, 2.0 SBS for transport, UBP 2 for procurement, UBP 2 for transport. Pending. Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]