[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Clarifying the code list qDT and uDT issue was Re: [ubl] MinutesUBL Atlantic call April 26 2006
Just to clarify a concern raised in the minutes. > > 7. Code lists: > > > A. Sylvia worried about qDT schema. > > B. Tim states that uDT is no longer needed. > : :<snipped out bits>> : > SW: does not understand why enumerations in > genericode list in the qDT unless they are > restrictions. A qDT is a restriction on > the base list on the uDT. > > I don't mean that the uDT is no longer need (we just inherit it from ATG2). Its just that I think the uDt for all codes is "CodeType". All UBL specified codes are restrictions on this type because they restrict the content to a given sets of values. So LatitudeDirectionCodeType is a restriction of CodeType. If you want you can think of CodeType as a code list that has infinite possible values. Thats what we did in UBL 1.0 and I think we should do the same in 2.0. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]