RE: [ubl] Coments to the Dispositions of Issues list by JPLSC

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2006-05-25 22:04 -0700, Sylvia Webb wrote:
>Please do not forget that we agreed in the 28 February UBL Pacific call that
>the UBL Codelist Methodology is an additional specification
>(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00115.html).
>
>This means that we need to provide values for codes as we did for UBL 1.0
>independent of what is needed for the new Codelist Methodology. Ideally,
>these values should be available for the next round of schema generation.

My understanding is the code list values will not be going into the 
schemas.  The schema expressions for every code list other than the 
three ATG code lists we are using will be the generic wild card 
allowing any value (I cannot remember off hand if the values were 
tokens or normalized strings).

While the code list methodology is a separate specification, and the 
code list values themselves are yet another deliverable, the schemas 
need to be structured in order to support the use of those specifications.

. . . . . . . . . Ken

--
Registration open for XSLT/XSL-FO training: Wash.,DC 2006-06-12/16
Also for XSL-FO/XSLT training:    Minneapolis, MN 2006-07-31/08-04
Also for XML/XSLT/XSL-FO/UBL training: Varo,Denmark 06-09-25/10-06
World-wide corporate, govt. & user group UBL, XSL, & XML training.
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal