Re: SV: SV: SV: [ubl] Revised discussion paper on UBL 2.0 subsets, extensions, versions, validation and interchange

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2006-06-20 16:18 +0200, Bryan  Rasmussen wrote:
>To be more specific:
>
>when I say non-deterministic and wrong I mean non-deterministic schema and
>wrong instance. :)
>Whereas XSV has returned
>non-deterministic schema and correct instance.
>I don't think this is wrong for XSV to say because I don't understand the
>spec to mean that a non-deterministic schema MUST always mean incorrect
>instances, but I think almost everybody else does. And as noted before it
>just seems really weird to think that one could have a non-deterministic
>schema but a correct instance by it, frankly the idea hurts my head.

Well, it caught me ... I was using Xerces and 
correctly catching incorrect instances and 
passing correct instances when all along, when as 
you showed, my schema was non-deterministic.

Truly bizarre and confusing.  But your 
demonstrative example was very helpful ... thanks again.

. . . . . . . . . Ken

--
Registration open for UBL training:    Montréal, Canada 2006-08-07
Also for XSL-FO/XSLT training:    Minneapolis, MN 2006-07-31/08-04
Also for UBL/XML/XSLT/XSL-FO training: Varo,Denmark 06-09-25/10-06
World-wide corporate, govt. & user group UBL, XSL, & XML training.
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal