OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: FW: [ubl] NDR 2.0 ELD8


Hi Mavis,

You are right, I accidentally looked at the Feb 2006 version. My apologies, and thank you for pointing it out to me.

Juerg

-----Original Message-----
From: Juerg Tschumperlin [mailto:juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz] 
Sent: Thursday, 22 June 2006 4:38 a.m.
To: juerg@paradise.net.nz
Subject: FW: [ubl] NDR 2.0 ELD8



> 
> ----------
> From: 	Mavis Cournane[SMTP:MAVIS.COURNANE@COGNITRAN.COM]
> Sent: 	Thursday, June 22, 2006 4:40:54 AM
> To: 	Juerg Tschumperlin
> Cc: 	ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: 	Re: [ubl] NDR 2.0 ELD8
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
> 
Hi Juerg
could you verify which version of the NDR document you are looking at. 
There is no ELD8 (or anything with that rule) in the latest draft NDR 
document from May 25th 2006 that is available in the UBL document 
archive.

Regards
Mavis
On 20 Jun 2006, at 23:28, juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The UBL 2.0 CBC xsd file made available a while ago does not seem to 
> adhere to ELD8:
>
> ELD8: Global elements declared for Qualified BBIE Properties must be 
> of the same type as its corresponding Unqualified BBIE Property. (i.e. 
> Property Term + Representation Term.)
>
> The CBC has an equal number of elements and complex Types, and all 
> elements are based on the like-named complex Type. (Unlike UBL 1.0)
>
> Is ELD8 obsolete, or the CBC an error?
>
> A separate question about ELD8 when implemented as shown in UBL 1.0: 
> Here's an example: Assume a is the property term (PT)qualifier
> b the PT poss. noun,
> c the PT prim. noun.
>
> Asumme in the model there is no instance of b,c without a qualifier.
>
> Why is a complex Type and an element created in CBC for b,c, which 
> incidentally are not used anywhere in CAC or document schemas? Are 
> these not surplus?
>
> Many thanks in advance
> Juerg



DISCLAIMER
This e-mail is intended for the addressee only and may contain information which is subject to legal privilege. The contents are not necessarily the official view or communication of the Ministry of Education. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail or any information in, or attached to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately or return the original message to the Ministry by e-mail, and destroy any copies. The Ministry does not accept any liability for changes made to this e-mail or attachments after sending. All e-mails have been scanned for viruses and content by security software. The Ministry reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its network.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]