Re: [ubl] Information items in 2-prd2-cd minimal instances

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2006-08-16 08:33 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote:
>as it happens when trying to create sample 
>instances with XMLSpy i used the 'only mandatory 
>elements' option and got documents that looked 
>like your reports, then went back and added the 
>"out of band stuff".  this proved to me that the 
>out of band stuff is sufficiently different for 
>each implementation (and instance) to make it impossible to standardize.
>
>its true it wasn't an exhaustive test but in my 
>mind we are close enough to the 80/20 line on this.

Excellent ... thanks for this feedback.  If you 
feel that what is there now is still workable 
with out-of-band additions, then I'm confident 
the issue has been addressed enough that we can 
continue with discussing the appropriateness of 
the "using out-of-band stuff" idea with the models as they stand.

Thanks, Tim, for investing the time to think about this.

. . . . . . . . . . Ken

--
UBL/XML/XSLT/XSL-FO training:         Vårø, Denmark 06-09-25/10-06
World-wide corporate, govt. & user group UBL, XSL, & XML training.
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal