RE: [ubl] NDR 2.0: Rule SSM4

[juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz]

Hi Michael,

I'm picking up the thread from June, and see that rule SSM4 has been removed entirely.

What's the rationale for the removal? Is it to permit imports of both non-UBL namespaces for use in the extension element as well as the UN/CEFACT UDT module?

Regards
Juerg



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: Grimley Michael J NPRI <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil> 
To: juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz, ubl@lists.oasis-open.org 
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:42:41 -0400 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Good point. We will have to *exclude* the UDT for the reason Sylvia pointed out yesterday. ('IdentifierType' vs. 'IDType').
 

-----Original Message-----
From: juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz [mailto:juerg.tschumperlin@minedu.govt.nz] 
Sent: Wednesday, 07 June 2006 1856
To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ubl] NDR 2.0: Rule SSM4

Hi,

SSM4: Imported schema modules MUST be fully conformant with UBL naming and design rules.

Does that include or exclude the UN/CEFACT UDT schema?

Regards
Juerg