[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Draft IDD 2.0 templates
[saito-yukinori@fujielectric.co.jp:] | I made the Common library spreadsheet that contains Business Process column. | I attached the Common library spreadsheet for JPLSC use. | I would like to use this spreadsheet for our Japanese translation. We need to discuss this during the conference calls next week. Among the questions I have: - If this is useful for JPLSC, then why not for all of us? - If this is useful only for JPLSC, what are the implications for making an integrated IDD? - Judging from the example, the only two "business processes" are "Procurement" and "Transportation." - Is this a useful distinction? - What do we do with information items that are used both for procurement and for transportation? - The business process assignments in the spec are much finer grained (Create Catalogue, Ordering, Fulfilment with Receipt Advice, etc.). Why are we not using those? Note that I am not saying that I think the Business Process column is not useful. I just want to be clear on how best to implement this idea. Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]