RE: [ubl-dev] Danish implementation of UBL published as GoodPractice Case in the EU eGovernment Good Practice Framework

[Sacha Schlegel <sacha_oasis@schlegel.li>]

Hi David

I am positively surprised that ebXML messaging (or at least the ebMS
header) was used as transport protocol on the VAN networks.

Somewhere along the lines:

"Instead of the secure VANS infrastructure (which does not use digital
signatures) in a next round the Internet based infrastructure will be
implemented, then heavily relying on digital signatures".

The way I understand [1] it is that for their next round "Internet"
infrastructure uses the Danish WS-Reliable Asynchronous Secure Profile
(WS-RASP, a Danish WS-I profile) and excludes ebXML Messaging :( which
is a pitty.

... specially as of those 1.2 million invoices (as of 2 months ago) each
one has been exclusively exchanged on the VANS with ebMS whereas 0
invoices have been exchanged with WS-RASP.

I do not understand why SME's shall not be able to use ebXML Messaging
solutions but WS-RASP solutions (none interoperabilty tested by third
parties as far as I know as opposed to ETSI ebXML PlugFest, Korbit, and
Drummond ebXML interops) even though the Danish Gov. seems to have made
good experiences with ebMS on VANS.

Maybe the NES project may have ebXML Messaging as first class citizen or
alternative option in their infrastructure considerations.

Question: Can a member of the NES project comment on their
infrastructure considerations regarding the support of ebXML
technologies (in particular ebXML Messaging)?

Regards

Sacha

[1] http://www.oio.dk/arkitektur/soa/infrastruktur/english

Am Donnerstag, den 01.02.2007, 07:06 -0700 schrieb David RR Webber
(XML):
> Mikkel, 
> 
> It's good to see that the VAN services message exchanges are based on
> ebXML ebMS enveloping. 
> 
> The whitepaper -
> http://www.egov-goodpractice.eu/download.php?PHPSESSID=4d40c221d1514f7679e6e6b7728bc060&fileid=1145
> 
> 
> does a good job of explaining the current VAN based solution.  I'd be
> interested to see how the 
> work we just released for the freeb-UBL toolkit can potential aid
> implementors too.
> 
> Thanks, DW
> 
> "The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)
> 
>  -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [ubl-dev] Danish implementation of UBL published as Good
> Practice  Case in the EU eGovernment Good Practice Framework
> From: "Mikkel Hippe Brun" <MHB@itst.dk>
> Date: Thu, February 01, 2007 8:20 am
> To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>, <ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> An extensive description of the Danish implementation of UBL for
> e-invoicing
> has been published at the EU eGovernment Good Practice Framework.
> 
> Abstract: http://www.egov-goodpractice.eu/gpd_details.php?&gpdid=1967
> Case description:
> http://www.egov-goodpractice.eu/download.php?&fileid=1145
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Mikkel Hippe Brun 
> Chief consultant, M.Sc.
> Direct: +45 3337 9220
> Cell: +45 2567 4252
> E-mail: mhb@itst.dk
> 
> National IT and Telecom Agency
> Center for Service Oriented Infrastructure
> Holsteinsgade 63
> DK-2100 Copenhagen 
> Denmark
> Tel: +45 3545 0000
> Fax: +45 3545 0010
> www.itst.dk
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>