Re: [ubl] Digital Signature

[stephen.green@systml.co.uk]

Hi Oriol, all,

Speaking personally, I think this was one of the reasons we
wanted the extensions element in UBL. Plus the need to add
other data like PDF and/or ledger data, hence the need for
more than one extension element in the extension 'container'
ABIE. Another reason was for simply extending the documents
but that is more a matter of customisation and came along
later. That's my take on it from memory. So it shouldn't
break NDR at all of course.

All the best

Stephen Green


Quoting Oriol <oriol@invinet.org>:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Here you have a brief draft explanation of a possible use of electronic
> digital signatures in the UBL documents.
>
>
>
> As you probably know, there are some European countries that mandate a
> signature in business documents, and I’ve been thinking in a way to add xml
> signatures without embedding an encoded file inside the
> EmbeddedDocumentBinaryObject.
>
>
>
> I’d like to know if this method breaks the UBL NDR or if you think it’s
> feasible.
>
>
>
> Oriol
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>