OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ubl] A discussion topic for Manhattan - modelling UBLExtensions


We can discuss this in Manhattan, but you'll remember that we
determined the extension point to be semantically empty.  If that's
the case, I don't think we want it in the spreadsheets.

Jon

   Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:50:23 -0500
   From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>

   Hi folks!

   I just remembered one topic I would like to bring up for discussion 
   in Manhattan regarding UBL 2.0 Update is that the documentation of 
   the <UBLExtensions> element was treated in UBL 2.0 solely as a 
   document-model-expression modification/adaptation.

   In the process of re-issuing the spreadsheets in UBL 2.0 Update with 
   repairs for the descriptions and other spreadsheet columns, I would 
   like us to consider repairing the spreadsheets with the addition of a 
   row representing the <UBLExtensions> element in each of the maindoc/ 
   document spreadsheets, thus treating this element as a first-class 
   construct in the model.

   This begs, then, how we should document the descendants of 
   <UBLExtensions> also as first-class objects.  For example I'm not 
   convinced they should be included as part of the Common 
   Library.  Rather they could be treated as a customized spreadsheet 
   along the lines of the separate spreadsheet for qDT that has a 
   different selection of columns that than for the elements.

   This is not a normative change, as the schemas are not impacted by 
   this one iota.  My higher-priority intent is to reflect the normative 
   <UBLExtensions> element found in the schemas in the 31 document model 
   spreadsheets where it is used.  Of lesser priority to me, documenting 
   all descendent elements in a similar fashion would help implementers.

   I acknowledge it may be far too late for considering this as part of 
   UBL 2.0 Update, but I didn't want the subject to be lost again to my memory.

   Thanks!

   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken

   --
   World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training
   RSS feeds:     publicly-available developer resources and training
   G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
   Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
   Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
   Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
   Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal


   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
   To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
   generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
   at:
   https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]