ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: ASBIE Sequence Re: [ubl] Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 1 October 2008
- From: "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>
- To: "UBL TC" <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:34:20 +0100
A question/comment regarding NDR 2.0 / moving towards UBL 2.1:
If the ASBIEs all follow the BBIEs in the model and therefore in the schema complex type sequence:
Does this work when there is a new BBIE added in a minor version? Does it make the minor version
no longer 'backwards' compatible since the new sequence contradicts the older one? Wouldn't new
BBIEs have to follow after older ASBIEs and BBIEs to keep the older sequence intact? If so doesn't
this rule (or rather 'convention') need to be relaxed in the NDR?
2008/10/1 Jon Bosak
<bosak@ibiblio.org>
MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING
WEDNESDAY 1 OCTOBER 2008
...
ACTION (9/24): MC to draft a new rule stating that the schema
retains and expresses the sequence of business information
entities in the model plus a note observing that in UBL
modeling, the order for an ABIE is that all the ASBIEs follow
the BBIEs.
Done.
--
Stephen D. Green
Document Engineering Services Ltd
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]