Re: IDD changes (was: Re: [ubl] UBL 2.0 IDD -- approval of candidate PRD)

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2008-10-24 08:16 -0400, Jon Bosak wrote:
>G. Ken Holman wrote:
>| Should we have "update" somewhere in the labelling of the files?
>
>I don't think so.  This is the first release of the UBL 2.0 IDD;
>it doesn't update anything.

Agreed, though I've been using "2.0 Update IDD", not "2.0 IDD Update".

These are translations of the definitions in the UBL 2.0 Update 
package and not of the definitions in the UBL 2.0 package.  My 
perspective was that of an outsider seeing:  UBL 2.0, UBL 2.0 IDD, 
UBL 2.0 Update ... would they think the IDD is out of date?

Wouldn't it be more reflective if what they saw was:  UBL 2.0, UBL 
2.0 Update, UBL 2.O Update IDD?

. . . . . . . . . Ken

--
Upcoming XSLT/XSL-FO hands-on courses:      Wellington, NZ 2009-01
Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video
Video sample lesson:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg
Video course overview:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal