Re: [ubl] Further SGTG explorations - some new revelations

[Stephen Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>]

Going back to the original reasons for including
the Core Components Types as a schema in UBL 1.0,
we did so for information reference only since no
other schema 'uses' it. It is a bit like an abstract
concept schema and the only connection of other
artefacts to it is conceptual. The unqualified
datatypes depend on these core component types
in the model, not in the schema package. The
unqualified datatypes have no schema reference to
the core component types but their *design* stems from
the core component types. It is the qualified datatypes
which have the UBL-specific details such as code lists
choices determined by the modelers. The UBL business
model architects should have no influence at all on
the core component types or the unqualified datatypes
but only on the qualified datatypes (such as codelist
bound qualified code types). So it still seems confusing
to even include the CCT schema in the package (though
I don't recollect if the NDR says to do so).

Best regards

Steve
---
Stephen D Green




2009/12/20 G. Ken Holman <gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com>:
> At 2009-12-20 09:17 +0100, JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino wrote:
>>
>> it seems this is the latest available at CEFACT D09A:
>>
>>
>> <http://www.unece.org/uncefact/data/standard/CoreComponentType_2p0.xsd>http://www.unece.org/uncefact/data/standard/CoreComponentType_2p0.xsd
>
> Thank you, Roberto!  This is what I was looking for.  At first glance it has
> all of the supplementary components I need and no hard-wired code lists.
>
>> By the way this is the D09A full page:
>>
>> <http://www.unece.org/cefact/xml_schemas/index.htm#2009A>http://www.unece.org/cefact/xml_schemas/index.htm#2009A
>>
>> P.S. Are we adopting all new codelists from D09A ?
>
> I have not received such direction from Tony or from PSC or TSC.  I am
> awaiting the business experts to tell me what I have to accommodate in the
> deliverable.  Actually, not to tell me directly, but to reflect the
> requirements in the information model.  The spreadsheets are expected to
> contain data type qualifications for code list items, as they did in UBL
> 2.0, and from there we can synthesize the required CVA file expressing the
> data type qualifications in UBL 2.1.
>
> Thank you again for finding the schema fragment.  I will see if I can
> restructure the SGTG strategy to use this file without any changes.
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
>
>
> --
> UBL and Code List training:      Copenhagen, Denmark 2010-02-08/10
> XSLT/XQuery/XPath training after http://XMLPrague.cz 2010-03-15/19
> XSLT/XQuery/XPath training:   San Carlos, California 2010-04-26/30
> Vote for your XML training:   http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/i/
> Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
> Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video
> Video lesson:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18
> Video overview:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18
> G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
> Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
> Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>