[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Latest SGTG snapshot - April 11, 2011 - UBL-SGTG-20110411-2050z
Thank you, Arianna, for your analysis. At 2011-04-13 12:04 +0200, Arianna Brutti wrote: >please, find my comments inline below. > >Best regards >Arianna > >Il 12/04/2011 00:54, G. Ken Holman ha scritto: >>... >>Remember in the report that the change in old data type >>qualification is acceptable. From what I read, I think I counted only one question that you asked me: >>Missing old Data Type Qualifications in new model: 1 >>"Status. Condition Code. Code" old="Transportation Status" new="" >[Arianna]: I am not understanding if something is wrong .. Ken, >please, can you explain? This report is acceptable because not only is the change is backward compatible, but the change reflects a conscious decision on the committee's part. In UBL 2.0 there was a code list value constraint on the status element. In UBL 2.1 there is no such constraint on this element. The report continues to include this check in the event that any other value validation constraint is inadvertently removed, as we would want to know about it. Thank you, again, for your efforts! . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting & instructor-led training Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]