Re: [ubl] Unexpected data type qualifications in the latest document model

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2013-01-07 19:28 +0100, Oriol Bausà Peris wrote:
> Regarding the Tenderer Role, here you have the list used in BII2.
>
> MT      Main tenderer
> SC      Subcontractor
> CL      Consortium leader
> CM      Consortium member

Excellent.  I can easily make a list out of that.

Is it your opinion that we should incorporate 
this list into the distribution second-pass value 
validation and default/ directory, or should we 
simply make this list available in the 
special-purpose/ directory?  My intuition is that 
it should only be in the special-purpose/ 
directory as an example, as worldwide there will 
be projects where there may be different 
roles.  I don't think it belongs in our distribution second-pass validation.

In contrast, the week day code list is enough of 
a universal concept that I am confident it makes 
sense to include in the distribution validation.

What about list metadata?  Shall we simply make 
this another UBL code list, as we did for 
latitude and longitude, or is there some BII 
ownership we should be citing in the canonical URI?

. . . . . . .  Ken


--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm
Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about
Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal