OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Ad-hoc meeting re: ANS status for UBL 2.1


Would interested committee members please indicate at this Doodle poll their availability for a short one-item agenda ad-hoc meeting regarding the minuted item below:

  http://doodle.com/42xzn78s3e5fz7wu

Please respond as soon as possible as one of the candidate times is less than 24 hours away.

Thank you for your quick action on this.

. . . . . . . . . Ken

At 2013-04-10 12:12 -0400, I wrote:
MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC TELECONFERENCE WEDNESDAY 10 APRIL 2013 14:00UTC
...
ANS Status

 - this was announced last week, has everyone reviewed it before this
   week's meetings?

   http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/liaison-policy-ansi-addendum

 - Ken H. approached TC Administration for guidance
   - very supportive response has been received
 - Pacific call comments:
   - committee discussed our preference for running the BSR-8 comment period
     in parallel with the OASIS 60 day membership review
 - Atlantic calls:
   - a number of concerns were expressed during the call
   - OASIS and ANSI are both considered as North American and that no
     benefit may be gained by making the effort; would non-North-American
     countries be concerned that it is too North-American-centric?  Would
     this jeopardize any future efforts of bringing UBL through an ISO
     process?
   - the ANS process should be done *after* the OASIS process is fully
     completed and not before, because if there is negative feedback from
     ANS members then it can be accommodated in UBL 2.2 and not delay the
     completion of UBL 2.1;  if it is done in parallel, then the risk is
     that one organization says "yes" and the other organization says "no"
     and that may undermine the credibility of the organization saying "yes"
   - not wise to go to only one national body, should we also be going to,
     say, the Northern European countries for additional acceptance?
   - possible perception of OASIS work being an out-sourced work source for
     ANSI and not being independent
 - Ken H. to convene a brief one-off single-agenda-item teleconference at a
   time suitable for members of both Pacific and Atlantic calls to discuss
   this issue, rather than try to get it done by email
 - when we come to an agreement on how to proceed, Ken H. to ask TC
   Administration for guidance on the appropriate motions and ballots and
   any specification modifications required for the BSR-8 review


--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]