[OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-120) Remove cac:EvidenceIssuingParty from cac:Evidence

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=66201#comment-66201 ] 

Enric Torregrosa edited comment on UBL-120 at 5/16/17 10:11 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

Good question, I thought that the Evidence component was introduced because of the ESPD Core Criterion and Evidence Vocabulary. If so then there would be no problems in removing the IssuerParty from Evidence. Oriol, can you confirm this, please?

KR


was (Author: enric):
Good question, I thought that the Evidence component was introduced because of the ESPD Core Criterion and Evidence Vocabulary. If so then there would be no problems in removing it form the IssuerParty from Evidence. Oriol, can you confirm this, please?

KR

> Remove cac:EvidenceIssuingParty from cac:Evidence
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UBL-120
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-120
>             Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Artefacts
>            Reporter: Enric Torregrosa
>            Assignee: Ole Madsen
>            Priority: Critical
>
> The presence of the IssuerParty inside the Evidence component is redundant and inconsistency-prone, as the component DocumentReference inside the Evidence does ALSO aggregate a cac:IssuerParty. We should use the cac:DocumentReference/cac:IssuerParty component.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)