[OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-138) bringing UBL "billing" documents in sync

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Kees Duvekot updated UBL-138:
-----------------------------

    Component/s: Documents and business objects

> bringing UBL "billing" documents in sync
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UBL-138
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-138
>             Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documents and business objects
>            Reporter: Kees Duvekot
>            Assignee: Ken Holman
>
> All,
>  
> As part of the analysis of tickets UBL-44, UBL-60 and UBL-137 I have looked at all the billing documents in UBL and see where they are  “not in sync” with each other.
>  
> I have looked at the following billing documents:
>  
> Invoice
> CreditNote
> SelfBilledInvoice
> SelfBilledCreditNote
> FreightInvoice
>  
> I have done a comparison of the various UBL elements that are in these documents on “header level”.
>  
> This is the result:
>  
> cbc:DueDate 
> This is only available in Invoice, and not in the other documents.
> As part of bringing all billing documents in sync I would propose to add this the the 4 other billing documents (preferably at the same “position” as invoice)
>  
> cbc:InvoiceTypeCode / cbc:CreditNoteTypeCode 
> In all documents except SelfBilledCreditNote there is a “TypeCode” element.
> I would propose to add the cbc:CreditNoteTypeCode to the SelfBilledCreditNote to bring it in line with the normal CreditNote Document.
>  
> cbc:BuyerReference 
> This element is available in Invoice and CreditNote, but not in the SelfBilled equivalents.
> I would propose to add this to both SelfBilledInvoice and SelfBilledCreditNote
> I would NOT include It in the FreightInvoice to avoid confusion about “Buyer” in the FreightInvoice context.
>  
> cac:DiscrepancyResponse 
> This element is available in both the CreditNote and SelfBilledCreditNote, not in the other documents
> I would propose to leave this .. because this is a specific element that is only relevant in the CreditNote context as far as I can tell.
>  
> cac:Shipment 
> This element is only available in the FreightInvoice, and is the only real element that is different with a “normal” invoice.
> I would NOT add this to the other documents to keep the separate status of FreightInvoice.
>  
> cac:StatementDocumentReference 
> This element is missing from the FreightInvoice.
> As far as I can tell the statements can not be used for “Freight” purpuses .. so not having this on the FreightInvoice makes sense
>  
> cac:ProjectReference 
> This element is only available in the Invoice, not in the other 4 billing documents.
> I would propose to add this element also to all the other billing documents.
>  
> cac:BuyerCustomerParty / cac:SellerSupplierParty 
> These two element are not available in the FreightInvoice
> It makes sense that they are NOT in the freightInvoice, but what would be the equivalants for Freight? Based on TransportExecutionPlan(Request)Type I would think TransportUserParty / TransportServiceProviderParty but I would leave that discussion for 2.3
>  
> cac:Delivery / cac:DeliveryTerms 
> These elements are not available in the FreighInvoice
> I would NOT add them to FreightInvoice, as that they are really “Ordering” related
>  
> cac:PrepaidPayment 
> This element is not available in the CreditNote and SelfBilledCreditNote
> But it makes sense that it is NOT there, because prepaying your credit … that does not make sense at all 
>  
> cac:WithholdingTaxTotal 
> This element is only available in the Invoice not in the other documents
> I would propose that we also add this to all the other elements to bring the WithHoldingTax handling on all documents in line with each other.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)