Re: [ubl] Putative voting documents for UBL 2.2 CSPRD03 for February 21, 2018

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2018-02-15 18:28 +1100, Levine Naidoo wrote:
> Looking at it for the first time and with a fresh pair of eye,

Thank you!

> I think Section 2, 2nd Para should be amended, 
> seems itâ??s a duplication of the same paragraph 
> from the UBL 2.1 documentation  - needs a 
> summary highlighting the difference between 2.2 and 2.1

Agreed.  I'll try to pull something together.

> and consequently figure 2 should be adjusted to accommodate the new use cases.

Perhaps additional figures if someone on the 
committee is prepared to create them in time, but 
until then I'll adjust the text and the titles to 
indicate that the diagrams describe portions of UBL.

I do not have the bandwidth to create additional diagrams.

Another option is to remove the diagrams entirely 
since they are no longer comprehensive.  I'm 
leaning towards this final solution if there are 
no diagrams forthcoming.  It might be better to 
not illustrate anything at all if what is illustrated is not complete.

Thanks, again, Levine!

. . . . . . . Ken


--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @ US$45 (5 hours free) |