Re: [uddi-dev]

[Jeff Burinda <jburinda@wand.com>]

JoséMiguel,

I think that what some people are trying to say is that as UDDI grows in
acceptance, you would be using applications or browsers that go to a UDDI
registry to find information about service providers that with whom you
would want to communicate.

The DNS service would not be replaced because in order to communicate with
the registry or to communicate with the entries within the registry, they
will have URLs that will probably still need to be resolved through a DNS.

Perhaps a better term that "substitute" is "augment" or "enhance as a next
tier".

(This statement is open for corrections of course)

Jeff Burinda
WAND Inc.

----- Original Message -----
From: "JoséMiguel Fernandes" <jmiguelsf@hotmail.com>
To: <uddi-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:59 PM
Subject: [uddi-dev]


>
> Hi!
>
> I'm writing an article about UDDI. I 'd like to compare it
> with DNS... some people says that "UDDI should substitute
> the actual DNS service". Can anyone tell me the reasons
> behind these afirmations ? UDDI is more scalable?
>
> Thanks and regards!
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Hotmail, o maior webmail do Brasil. http://www.hotmail.com
>
>