[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [uddi-dev] Multiple access points II
While we are on this topic, I would like to ask a related question. What is the suggested modeling approach for two load balanced services? If two services are load balanced, do we create two business services with each one having the access point for one service or do we create two binding templates in one business service representing each access point? Because both of these services (access points for the same service) implement the same interface, they have essentially one WSDL. Any insights would be helpful... Thanks, Ramesh. -----Original Message----- From: John Colgrave [mailto:colgrave@hursley.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:34 AM To: uddi-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [uddi-dev] Multiple access points II Paul, The new Technical Note on using WSDL and UDDI, being developed by the OASIS UDDI Specifications Technical Committee, restricts a UDDI businessService to represent at most one WSDL service so if Explode is one WSDL service and Implode is a different WSDL service then they should be represented as different UDDI businessServices. This Technical Note should be released in the not-too-distant future. John Colgrave IBM -----Original Message----- From: psterk@phys-hanwk16-2.ebay.sun.com [mailto:psterk@phys-hanwk16-2.ebay.sun.com] On Behalf Of Paul Sterk Sent: 07 March 2003 01:30 To: uddi-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [uddi-dev] Multiple access points II Hi, Second question regarding multiple access points per service. A proposal has come up to allow someone to register a service and have multiple accessPoints for the service. The issue here is that each accessPoint points to a different service. Let me give an example: The service is registered as Bill of Materials. It has two accessPoints: Bill of Materials Explode http://hostname/bomExplode Bill of Materials Implode http//hostname/bomImplode These are two different services with different associated WSDL docs. I am personally uncomfortable with this model because I believe that each businessService should be mapped to one service implementation. I feel that BOMExplode and BOMImplode are two different services and should be registered separately. However, I would like here what your experience and opinions are in this area. If this model is acceptable, how do you find a specific accessPoint programmtically (JAXR) in UDDI v2.0? Do you use the tModelInstanceDetails object? Any feedback in this regard would be very helpful. Thanks, Paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]