RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons

[Tom Glover <glover@ca.ibm.com>]

WS-I Fud?

---

Tom Glover, Senior Program Manager, Web Services Standards, IBM Software
Group 
email/sametime: glover@ca.ibm.com
| external: 905.413.4220 | IBM tieline: 969-4220 
my blogs: external
html | internal (html
, rss)

Wendy Burton, Assistant & Project Manager, IBM Software Group 
email/sametime: burton@ca.ibm.com
| external: 905.413.2549 | IBM tieline: 969-2549

"Governor James" <jgovernor@redmonk.com>

06/22/2005 10:02 AM

To	Jørgen Thyme <jt@globeteam.com>, <uddi-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons

Sun already supports a dual
registry strategy, as does infravio. Others are likely to follow, WS-I
fud notwithstanding.
 
Coexistence is surely the best
approach.

---

From: Jørgen Thyme [mailto:jt@globeteam.com]
Sent: 22 June 2005 13:54
To: uddi-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons
 
I have looked at the specs for v3 for the
ebXML registry. Although the information model looks more detailed than
in UDDI my immediate thinking was that adding my taxonomies in UDDI I can
achieve a lot. And there are several implementations of UDDI.
 
What are your thoughts? Will vendors of UDDI
registries add ebXML registry functionality to their existing products?
Or will there be a complete new set of registry products coming?
 
 
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
 
Jørgen Thyme
 
Development Team
Globeteam A/S
Gentoftegade 118-120
DK-2820 Gentofte

Tlf.: +45 70 26 29 70
Fax.: +45 70 26 29 80
Mobil: +45 40 90 41 67
jt@globeteam.com