RE: [uddi-spec] RE: OASIS UDDI TC Submission of UDDI V2 as an OASISStandard

[Matthew Dovey <matthew.dovey@las.ox.ac.uk>]

Well, I don't know much about OASIS procedures being a new member but in
the notes of 9/13/2002 it states: 

"V2 Standard Resolution: A resolution to approve the OASIS UDDI V2
Specifications for submission to OASIS vote as an OASIS Standard was
presented. 

An individual vote was taken and the resolution passed. There was no
dissent."

	So we definitely voted and agreed on something ;-)
	 
	Matthew
	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Luc Clement [mailto:lclement@microsoft.com] 
	Sent: Fri 13/12/2002 15:56 
	To: 
	Cc: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org 
	Subject: [uddi-spec] RE: OASIS UDDI TC Submission of UDDI V2 as
an OASIS Standard
	
	

	I've taken this off-line with Karl to get clarifications on what
"Public Review" means precisely and if this hasn't happened IAW OASIS
rules, what is required specifically to satisfy the needs.
	
	It was Tom's and my opinion, as well as generally voiced by
members of the TC, that we had acted and satisfied the intent. If not,
so be it and we'll go through with it.
	
	I would like to hear the opinion of TC members who care to
comment.
	
	Luc Clément
	Microsoft
	Co-chair, OASIS UDDI Spec TC
	
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: Karl Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
	Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 05:31
	To: Tom Bellwood
	Cc: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org; Luc Clement
	
	Tom, Luc:
	
	When did the TC conduct a public review? I'm not aware of this
having happpened, and I don't recall seeing any announcements to the
members.
	Making the spec "available for review" isn't the same as
conducting a review. The wording of the Process is as follows:
	
	"Before the TC can submit its Committee Specification to OASIS
membership for review and approval as an OASIS Standard, the TC must
conduct a public review of the work. The decision by the TC to submit
the work for review requires a majority vote. The review should be
publicized on applicable OASIS mail lists and other public mail lists.
	Review must take place for a minimum of 30 days, during which
time no changes may be made to the document. Comments must be collected
via the TC's public comment list. The TC must record the comments
received as well as the resolution of those comments."
	
	If you did indeed conduct a formal public review then I'll start
processing your submission, but I can't do this unless I see that a
review took place.
	
	-Karl
	
	
	
	
	
	
	Tom Bellwood wrote:
	>
	>
	>
	> Karl,
	>
	> Luc Clement and myself, acting on behalf of the OASIS UDDI TC,
are
	> hereby officially submitting the OASIS UDDI V2 Specification
for consideration by
	> the OASIS Membership as an OASIS Standard.   The OASIS UDDI V2
	> Specification has been available for review for approximately
3 months
	> without feedback resulting in further changes.  We, the UDDI
TC,
	> therefore feel that the UDDI V2 Specification is ready to
progress to
	> an OASIS Standard.  This  action was approved by an over 2/3
favorable vote of the
	> entire TC membership, without dissent, in a vote taken
9/13/2002.   The
	> attendant documentation for this submission is publicly
available, via the
	> links below.   Please let us know if anything else needs to be
done to move
	> this work forward for vote.
	>
	> Links to the V2 Specification and related Documents are
available at:
	>
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/tcspecs.shtml#uddiv2
	>
	> The documents included are:
	>
	>       UDDI Version 2 API Specification
	>       UDDI Version 2 Data Structure Reference
	>       UDDI Version 2 XML Schema
	>       UDDI Version 2 Replication Specification
	>       UDDI Version 2 XML Replication Schema
	>       UDDI Version 2 XML Custody Schema
	>       UDDI Version 2 Operator's Specification
	>       UDDI Version 2 WSDL Service Interface Descriptions
	>       UDDI Version 2 tModels
	>
	>
	> Public Statements on the part of member companies or
organizations
	> indicating successful use of the UDDI V2 Specification:
	>
	>>From Fujitsu:
	>
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec/200211/msg00157.html
	>
	>>From IBM:
	>
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec/200211/msg00072.html
	>
	>>From Microsoft:
	>
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec/200211/msg00076.html
	>
	>>From NTT Communications:
	>
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec/200211/msg00098.html
	>
	>>From SAP:
	>
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec/200210/msg00005.html
	>
	>>From Oracle:
	>
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec/200211/msg00149.html
	>
	>
	>
	> Tom Bellwood and Luc Clement
	> Co-Chairs, OASIS UDDI Specification TC
	>
	>
	>
	
	
	--
	
=================================================================
	Karl F. Best
	Vice President, OASIS
	+1 978.667.5115 x206
	karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org
	
	
	
	----------------------------------------------------------------
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>