Re: [uddi-spec] CR for keyedRefernce requirement in groups

[Andrew Hately <hately@us.ibm.com>]

Max,

The schema allows for the case where
a user wants to query for entities which have the keyedReferenceGroup without
specifying any values within the group.

Although we have tried to avoid element
cardinality enforcement after schema assessment/validation, what I propose
is that we do enforce this special case as the flexibility of storing a
keyedReferenceGroup with no keyedReferences is likely to cause some confusion
on the difference between modeling a keyedReferenceGroup without any keyedReferences
and just using a keyedReference.

Andrew Hately
IBM Austin
UDDI Development, Emerging Technologies 
Lotus Notes: Andrew Hately/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Internet: hately@us.ibm.com
(512) 838-2866,  t/l 678-2866

Max Voskob <mvoskob@msi.com.au>

02/06/2003 02:24 AM

To	uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject	Re: [uddi-spec] CR for keyedRefernce requirement in groups

Andrew,

Do we need to change the schema?
I think it should look like this:

<xsd:complexType name="keyedReferenceGroup" final="restriction">
<xsd:sequence>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <xsd:element
ref="uddi:keyedReference" minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name="tModelKey" type="uddi:tModelKey"
use="required"/>
</xsd:complexType>

Otherwise the schema will be out of synch with the spec.

Cheers,
Max
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Andrew
Hately 
To: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org

Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:04 PM
Subject: [uddi-spec] CR for keyedRefernce requirement
in groups


Please review the attache CR-0026 



Andrew Hately
IBM Austin
UDDI Development, Emerging Technologies