[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] RE: Initial V4 Requirements List
Claus / Daniel, I'll add appropriate items to the list of V4 requirements. Regarding versionining, whether we end up making all these into a V4 release, or a 3.1 or whatever is something that can be decided later once we understand the intended content better. Thanks, Tom Bellwood Phone: (512) 838-9957 (external); TL: 678/9957 (internal) Co-Chair, OASIS UDDI Specification TC STSM - Emerging Technologies IBM Corporation "Daniel Feygin" <feygin@unitspace.com> on 03/28/2003 09:04:04 AM To: "'Von Riegen, Claus'" <claus.von.riegen@sap.com> cc: Tom Bellwood/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] RE: Initial V4 Requirements List Claus, I wanted to ask for something very much along the lines of what you are referring to in your item 4. My grief is that find qualifiers apply equally to all bags in a request, while each bag has a distinct and very different meaning. Because the bags have no direct semantic relationship to each other, it would make sense to me to have separate find qualifiers for each bag in an inquiry request. It may be that you meant to bring up the same thing, because logical operations are the only ones that apply to bags. If not, then perhaps we should note that work item for the purposes of a future discussion as follows: Revisit of find qualifiers for bag bahavior wrt: a) logical operations; b) applicability to all bags. This way both issues will get the attention, unless, of course, we are both referring to the same thing. Thanks, Daniel > -----Original Message----- > From: Von Riegen, Claus [mailto:claus.von.riegen@sap.com] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 4:47 PM > To: 'Tom Bellwood'; uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [uddi-spec] RE: Initial V4 Requirements List > > > Hi Tom and all, > > Here is my shortlist of major work items I'd like to see addressed: > > 1) SOAP 1.2 (when published as a W3C Recommendation, > eventually addressed as an add-on to UDDI Version 2 and 3) > 2) WS-I > a) Adoption of UDDI specifications (especially UDDI Version > 3 and SCC14N) and best practices (especially the new WSDL TN) > in WS-I profiles > b) Conformance of UDDI with WS-I profiles (eventually by > using WS-I test tools) > 3) WS-Policy (when submitted to a standards organization) > a) Expressing UDDI Version 3 policy by means of WS-Policy > b) TN for using WS-Policy in UDDI (both Version 2 and 3) > 4) Revisit of find qualifiers for *bag behavior with respect > to logical operators > 5) Representation and identification of UDDI registries in > UDDI in order to support more seamless federation > > Almost all work items may be addressed by Technical Notes or > small add-ons to the existing UDDI versions. I don't see a > real need for UDDI Version 4 yet. Maybe a UDDI Version 3.1 is > what we (and the industry) need. > > Regards, > Claus > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Bellwood [mailto:bellwood@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 18. März 2003 05:09 > To: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Initial V4 Requirements List > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > Attached is the strawman V4 Requirements list constructed during our > November FTF. Please look through these. Please post > suggesting your own > as well. Recall that we'd like to start dividing up > responsibility for > fleshing these out at next week's meeting. > > (See attached file: V4 Requirements Topics.doc) > > Thanks, > Tom Bellwood Phone: (512) 838-9957 (external); TL: 678/9957 > (internal) > Co-Chair, OASIS UDDI Specification TC >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]