RE: [uddi-spec] Submission of draft TN "Using BPEL4WS in a UDDI registry"

["Luc Clement" <luc.clement@systinet.com>]

Title: Submission of draft TN "Using BPEL4WS in a UDDI registry"

Claus,

 

Please find attached input of Systinet's review of the TN. One thing to note is that (and also pointed out by John Colgrave) we should consider updating the Using WSDL in a UDDI Registry, Version 2 TN to generalize the wsdl:portType tModel. Doing so now is warranted given that Errata #1 is currently under consideration; we might as well make the update now and avoid another errata.

 

Please also note that I would be happy to be one of the two editors of this TN; I think that John may also have volunteered (or been volunteered).

 

Regards,

Luc

---

From: Von Riegen, Claus [mailto:claus.von.riegen@sap.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:17
To: uddi-spec
Subject: [uddi-spec] Submission of draft TN "Using BPEL4WS in a UDDI registry"

As promised during the FTF last month, I just uploaded a draft Technical Note that outlines an approach for publishing BPEL4WS abstract processes in UDDI so that these process definitions, related tModels that represent Web service interfaces and bindingTemplates that represent implementing Web services can be found in a standardized manner.

The document can be found at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/download.php/6407/uddi-spec-tc-tn-bpel-20040415.doc.

May I ask to add an agenda item to our next conference call in order to discuss next steps in this regard?

Thanks,
 Claus

Review of TN Using BPEL in a UDDI Registry.zip