uddi-spec message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [uddi-spec] Second objection - OASIS UDDI v3 Specification
- From: Andrew Hately <hately@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Luc Clement" <luc.clement@systinet.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:37:17 -0600
Was a definition of federate provided
with the feedback?
If none was provided, we can probably
assume that the comment was related to affiliation for tommorow's call.
Regards,
Andrew Hately
IBM Software Group, Emerging Technologies
email: hately@us.ibm.com
phone: (512) 838-2866
"Luc Clement"
<luc.clement@systinet.com>
01/31/2005 09:07 PM
|
To
| <uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [uddi-spec] Second objection
- OASIS UDDI v3 Specification |
|
Please note the second objection
Luc Clément
Senior Program Manager, Systinet
Tel: +1.781.362.1330 / Cell: +1.978.793.2162 / www.systinet.com
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/voting/vote_details.php?id=675&voter_id=777
Ballot: Approve UDDI v3.0.2 as an OASIS
standard Company:
Mitre Corporation
Vote:
No
Comment:
MITRE would like the TC to reconsider the current wording
in the standard regarding Subscription APIs, a functionality that is being
seriously considered by a MITRE customer. Specifically, the TC could consider
the foll. wording change "If a UDDI registry must federate with other
UDDI registries, then the registries SHOULD have at least one node that
offers the Subscription API, otherwise the Subscription API is OPTIONAL".
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]