[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [uiml-comment] Summary of issues raised by Takashi Endo and suggested UIML 4.0 changes
On 12/7/07, Jo Vermeulen <jo.vermeulen@uhasselt.be> wrote: > On Dec 4, 2007 10:33 AM, <takashi.endou.zs@kyocera.jp> wrote: <snip> > > > > <uiml> > > <interface> > > <structure> > > <part id="id1" source="#tpl" how="replace"> > > </part> > > </structure> > > </interface> > > <template id="tpl"> > > <part> > > <part id="entry_copy" class="Entry"/> > > <part id="btn_copy" class="Button"> > > <style> <!-- The original Listing 9 misses it --> > > <property name="label">Click to copy</property> > > </style> <!-- The original Listing 9 misses it --> > > </part> > > </part> > > </template> > > </uiml> > > > > I think this results in the following listing when the template is > > inserted. > > > > <uiml> > > <interface> > > <structure> > > <part id="id1"> > > <part id="id1_tpl_entry_copy" class="Entry"/> > > <part id="id1_tpl_btn_copy" class="Button"> > > <style> > > <property name="label">Click to copy</property> > > </style> > > </part> > > </part> > > </structure> > > </interface> > > </uiml> > > > > The top part "id1" survives. And the FQIDs contain "id1_tpl_". > > > > You are right in my opinion, the top part does survive. I will update it. > > Does everyone else agree? > I agree. The placeholder ID is preserved and all children should get the FQID. Thanks! Jim
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]